On 04/16/2010 06:54 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:24:09PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Using sssm_*_init() as the name of the initialization function for
>> identity providers was a holdover from earlier development when we
>> thought we would only have a single "provider
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:24:09PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Using sssm_*_init() as the name of the initialization function for
> identity providers was a holdover from earlier development when we
> thought we would only have a single "provider" entry in the config
> file.
>
> As we have n
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:24:09 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Using sssm_*_init() as the name of the initialization function for
> identity providers was a holdover from earlier development when we
> thought we would only have a single "provider" entry in the config
> file.
>
> As we have now se
Using sssm_*_init() as the name of the initialization function for
identity providers was a holdover from earlier development when we
thought we would only have a single "provider" entry in the config
file.
As we have now separated out the initialization functions for
auth, chpass and access, we