-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/2009 03:56 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> I still find it hard to test, but I think the general logic is right.
>
> ACK
>
Pushed to master
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in valu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/2009 12:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:03 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> ok,
>> modified patch attached.
>
> Rebased on top of current master.
>
> Simo.
Ack
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value y
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:14:22PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:03 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > ok,
> > modified patch attached.
>
> Rebased on top of current master.
>
> Simo.
>
I still find it hard to test, but I think the general logic is right.
ACK
bye,
Sumit
__
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:03 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> ok,
> modified patch attached.
Rebased on top of current master.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
>From 623b66a6817c4b87eefddb2d0f2591d18b16ba76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simo Sorce
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:11:28 -0500
S
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:16 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:59:49AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:55:51PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > This patch implements the use of the fail_over code u
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:59:49AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:55:51PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > This patch implements the use of the fail_over code under the control of
> > > the data provider backend code. All
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:55:51PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > This patch implements the use of the fail_over code under the control of
> > the data provider backend code. All providers share the same failover
> > structure and if they use the
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:55:51PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> This patch implements the use of the fail_over code under the control of
> the data provider backend code. All providers share the same failover
> structure and if they use the same service name, they also share the
> same servers lists.
This patch implements the use of the fail_over code under the control of
the data provider backend code. All providers share the same failover
structure and if they use the same service name, they also share the
same servers lists.
A set of callbacks is made available so that if a new resolution i
