On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:31:06AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:17:20AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:19:25AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > attached is a small patch I prepared when testing the PAC responder
> > > patches. In
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:17:20AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:19:25AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > attached is a small patch I prepared when testing the PAC responder
> > patches. In my case, the user was a member of a well-known SID S-1-18-1
> > which didn
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:19:25AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a small patch I prepared when testing the PAC responder
> patches. In my case, the user was a member of a well-known SID S-1-18-1
> which didn't resolve into a domain and all his groups were skipped. I
> think we s
Hi,
attached is a small patch I prepared when testing the PAC responder
patches. In my case, the user was a member of a well-known SID S-1-18-1
which didn't resolve into a domain and all his groups were skipped. I
think we should just skip the offending SID and carry on.
>From ce3b5bac3449abda1158
