On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 11:21 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 21:48 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:47:09PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:34:07PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > while working on adding new
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 21:48 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:47:09PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:34:07PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > while working on adding new nss responder calls for SID related lookups
> > > I realized that I
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:47:09PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:34:07PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while working on adding new nss responder calls for SID related lookups
> > I realized that I can copy-and-paste some existing code again and add
> > even mor
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:34:07PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while working on adding new nss responder calls for SID related lookups
> I realized that I can copy-and-paste some existing code again and add
> even more duplication or start to refactor some of the existing code in
> the nss
Hi,
while working on adding new nss responder calls for SID related lookups
I realized that I can copy-and-paste some existing code again and add
even more duplication or start to refactor some of the existing code in
the nss responder. It preferred to second and the attached pathc is the
result.
