-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/2010 07:51 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 08:29 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>> rebased versions are attached. It was necessary to add some
>>> modifications during the rebase. I have done a couple of online and
>>> offline test but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2010 08:29 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:52:31AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 09:50 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:33:04AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 07/08/2010 12:57
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:52:31AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/08/2010 09:50 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:33:04AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 07/08/2010 12:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/08/2010 09:50 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:33:04AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 12:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Just a reminder that it's been about a month since there was any
activity on thi
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:33:04AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/08/2010 12:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Just a reminder that it's been about a month since there was any
> > activity on this patch.
> >
>
> *bump* Any word on th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/08/2010 03:33 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> *bump* Any word on this one, Sumit? Would you prefer that I have someone
> else look into this?
I think Sumit stated yesterday that he's currently swamped, as my task
list for the upcoming release is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/2010 12:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Just a reminder that it's been about a month since there was any
> activity on this patch.
>
*bump* Any word on this one, Sumit? Would you prefer that I have someone
else look into this?
>
> On 06/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a reminder that it's been about a month since there was any
activity on this patch.
On 06/10/2010 07:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 05:56 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch for master saves all IPA HBAC data in one tr
On 06/10/2010 05:56 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch for master saves all IPA HBAC data in one transaction and
> proceeds if the sysdb transaction fails. It addresses a review comment
> from the "Use new schema for HBAC service checks" patch.
>
> The first patch changes the handling of th
Hi,
this patch for master saves all IPA HBAC data in one transaction and
proceeds if the sysdb transaction fails. It addresses a review comment
from the "Use new schema for HBAC service checks" patch.
The first patch changes the handling of the host data to be compatible
with the other data. The
10 matches
Mail list logo