On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 08:04 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:13 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:30 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > > > Nack.
> > > > >
> > > > > You still have unchecked talloc_strdup() calls in this patch in
> > > > > select_princip
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:13 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:30 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > > Nack.
> > > >
> > > > You still have unchecked talloc_strdup() calls in this patch in
> > > > select_principal_from_keytab().
> > >
> > > I don't think so, all talloc_strdup() cal
> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:30 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > Nack.
> > >
> > > You still have unchecked talloc_strdup() calls in this patch in
> > > select_principal_from_keytab().
> >
> > I don't think so, all talloc_strdup() calls in that function are checked
> > for NULL output. But there was
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:30 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > Nack.
> >
> > You still have unchecked talloc_strdup() calls in this patch in
> > select_principal_from_keytab().
>
> I don't think so, all talloc_strdup() calls in that function are checked for
> NULL output. But there was a tiny glitch,
> Nack.
>
> You still have unchecked talloc_strdup() calls in this patch in
> select_principal_from_keytab().
I don't think so, all talloc_strdup() calls in that function are checked for
NULL output. But there was a tiny glitch, which is fixed in attached patch.
Jan
From 5766ed723efa52e0e1137c4
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:41 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > If SDAP_SASL_AUTHID is specified, then ONLY this auth ID is allowable.
> > If the keytab doesn't contain it, we need to fail.
> >
> > If SDAP_SASL_REALM is specified, then only the REALM portion is
> > mandatory (
Jan Zelený wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > If SDAP_SASL_AUTHID is specified, then ONLY this auth ID is allowable.
> > If the keytab doesn't contain it, we need to fail.
> >
> > If SDAP_SASL_REALM is specified, then only the REALM portion is
> > mandatory (if we have no entries for this rea
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> If SDAP_SASL_AUTHID is specified, then ONLY this auth ID is allowable.
> If the keytab doesn't contain it, we need to fail.
>
> If SDAP_SASL_REALM is specified, then only the REALM portion is
> mandatory (if we have no entries for this realm in the keytab, we need
> to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/2011 04:07 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm sending corrected patches. All your suggestions and objections have been
> addressed except maybe for this:
>
>> If the SDAP_SASL_AUTHID has been explicitly set, but the SDAP_SASL_REALM
>> hasn't,
Hi,
I'm sending corrected patches. All your suggestions and objections have been
addressed except maybe for this:
> If the SDAP_SASL_AUTHID has been explicitly set, but the SDAP_SASL_REALM
> hasn't, why are you overriding SDAP_SASL_AUTHID with
> select_principal_from_keytab()?
I agree with you t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/29/2011 03:48 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Jan Zelený wrote:
>> I'm sending two patches solving selection of appropriate principal for
>> GSSAPI authentication from keytab file.
>>
>> A part of the first patch is a fix of an error present in the
>> d
Jan Zelený wrote:
> I'm sending two patches solving selection of appropriate principal for
> GSSAPI authentication from keytab file.
>
> A part of the first patch is a fix of an error present in the
> documentation. I did that early in the development phase of the patch and
> I didn't want to tam
Jan Zelený wrote:
> I'm sending two patches solving selection of appropriate principal for
> GSSAPI authentication from keytab file.
>
> A part of the first patch is a fix of an error present in the
> documentation. I did that early in the development phase of the patch and
> I didn't want to tam
I'm sending two patches solving selection of appropriate principal for GSSAPI
authentication from keytab file.
A part of the first patch is a fix of an error present in the documentation. I
did that early in the development phase of the patch and I didn't want to
tamper with the finished patch
14 matches
Mail list logo