-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2009 12:56 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 09/30/2009 05:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
without a second pair of eyes.
The patch looks fine, updates only .po files -- I
Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
without a second pair of eyes.
On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 10:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Sent on behalf of Piotr Drąg
Is this waiting an ack ?
Simo.
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 11:15 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
without a second pair of eyes.
On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 10:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
