On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:16:01AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 01:36 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:22:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>On 09/03/2013 12:57 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>this issue was discovered by a user and as far as I can see
On 09/03/2013 01:36 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:22:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 09/03/2013 12:57 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this issue was discovered by a user and as far as I can see it was
always there. Feel free to apply it to older branches as well.
bye,
Sumit
On 09/03/2013 01:36 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:22:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 09/03/2013 12:57 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this issue was discovered by a user and as far as I can see it was
always there. Feel free to apply it to older branches as well.
bye,
Sumit
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:22:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 12:57 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >this issue was discovered by a user and as far as I can see it was
> >always there. Feel free to apply it to older branches as well.
> >
> >bye,
> >Sumit
>
> Hi,
> >/* If th
On 09/03/2013 12:57 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this issue was discovered by a user and as far as I can see it was
always there. Feel free to apply it to older branches as well.
bye,
Sumit
Hi,
/* If the resolver is set to honor both address families
* and the first one matched, retry
Hi,
this issue was discovered by a user and as far as I can see it was
always there. Feel free to apply it to older branches as well.
bye,
Sumit
From 1d0f9a79a0e0f58082ab28725515af378a19524e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 17:35:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dyndns: d