On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:00:27PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:28:05AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > >
> > > Attached patch use the same approach as in ldap_child.
> >
> > To bring this thread to an end
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:28:05AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >
> > Attached patch use the same approach as in ldap_child.
>
> To bring this thread to an end, I think it is ok for the time being to
> do the same as ldap_child and
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/04/14 22:21), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:20:50PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (07/04/14 21:01), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >> >On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:39:07PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >> On Mo
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:36:39PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/04/14 22:21), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:20:50PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> but there is no difference. You allocate debug_prg_name on NULL and then
> >> steal
> >> to another talloc context. (li
On (07/04/14 22:21), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:20:50PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (07/04/14 21:01), Sumit Bose wrote:
>> >On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:39:07PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:35:20PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> > On (07/
On (07/04/14 21:01), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:39:07PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>
>> Except first patch didn't allocate on NULL? I think that was the meat of
>> Sumit's comments..
>
>yes, just allocate on NULL and free it explicitly in the end to make
>valgrind happy.
It is e
On (07/04/14 22:21), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:20:50PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> but there is no difference. You allocate debug_prg_name on NULL and then
>> steal
>> to another talloc context. (like in ldap_child)
>
>Why do you have to steal it? Just allocate on NULL and
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:20:50PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/04/14 21:01), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:39:07PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:35:20PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> > On (07/04/14 20:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> > >On
On (07/04/14 21:01), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:39:07PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:35:20PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > On (07/04/14 20:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > >On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:03:32PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > >> On (
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:39:07PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:35:20PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (07/04/14 20:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:03:32PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >> On (07/04/14 18:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:03:32PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/04/14 18:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:41:38PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (04/04/14 15:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >> O
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:35:20PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/04/14 20:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:03:32PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (07/04/14 18:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:41:38PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >
On (07/04/14 20:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:03:32PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (07/04/14 18:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:41:38PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (04/04/14 15:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> >On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 0
On (07/04/14 18:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:41:38PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (04/04/14 15:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:53:31PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> > On
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:41:38PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (04/04/14 15:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:53:31PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> > On (20/03/14 17:21), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> > >
On (04/04/14 15:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:53:31PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > On (20/03/14 17:21), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > >On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:00:00PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> > >> On Thu,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:53:31PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (20/03/14 17:21), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:00:00PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:20:59PM +0100, Lukas Slebo
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:53:31PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (20/03/14 17:21), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:00:00PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:20:59PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> > ehlo,
> >> >
> >> > debug_prg_name is used in debu
On (20/03/14 17:21), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:00:00PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:20:59PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > ehlo,
>> >
>> > debug_prg_name is used in debug_fn and it was allocated under
>> > talloc context "kr". The variable "kr" w
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:00:00PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:20:59PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > ehlo,
> >
> > debug_prg_name is used in debug_fn and it was allocated under
> > talloc context "kr". The variable "kr" was removed before the last debug
> > messages i
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:20:59PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> debug_prg_name is used in debug_fn and it was allocated under
> talloc context "kr". The variable "kr" was removed before the last debug
> messages in function main. It is very little change that it will be
> overridden.
ehlo,
debug_prg_name is used in debug_fn and it was allocated under
talloc context "kr". The variable "kr" was removed before the last debug
messages in function main. It is very little change that it will be overridden.
It is possible to see this issue with exported environment variable
TALLOC_F
22 matches
Mail list logo