On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:15:41AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:04:19AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > Arguments ignore_unknown_user ignore_authinfo_unavail are also
> > > > implemented in pam_ldap.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Not a full review, just a grammar review o
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:04:19AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > Arguments ignore_unknown_user ignore_authinfo_unavail are also
> > > implemented in pam_ldap.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Not a full review, just a grammar review of the manpage.
> >
> > Ack to the manpage phrasing.
>
> I tested the patch
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:36:08AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon 26 May 2014 06:18:08 PM EDT, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (14/03/14 14:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:14:04PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon 26 May 2014 06:18:08 PM EDT, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (14/03/14 14:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:14:04PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (13/03/14 15:24), Pete Fritchman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:28 P
On (14/03/14 14:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:14:04PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (13/03/14 15:24), Pete Fritchman wrote:
>> >On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> would you like any help amending the patch ? Are you still planning on
>> >> re-se
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:14:04PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (13/03/14 15:24), Pete Fritchman wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> would you like any help amending the patch ? Are you still planning on
> >> re-sending it?
> >
> >Hi Jakub,
> >
> >Sorry - I fo
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:05:00PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 03:24:13PM -0400, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > would you like any help amending the patch ? Are you still planning on
> > > re-sending it?
> >
> > Hi Jak
On (13/03/14 15:24), Pete Fritchman wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> would you like any help amending the patch ? Are you still planning on
>> re-sending it?
>
>Hi Jakub,
>
>Sorry - I forgot to follow up to this thread. I attached a new patch
>to the ticket that inc
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 03:24:13PM -0400, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > would you like any help amending the patch ? Are you still planning on
> > re-sending it?
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Sorry - I forgot to follow up to this thread. I attached a new p
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> would you like any help amending the patch ? Are you still planning on
> re-sending it?
Hi Jakub,
Sorry - I forgot to follow up to this thread. I attached a new patch
to the ticket that includes the case where send_and_receive returns
PAM_I
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:39:28AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:00:08AM -0500, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2232
> >
> > FreeBSD's openpam doesn't have a built in way of ignoring an unknown
> > user (e.g. treating PAM_USER_UNKNOWN as a p
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:36:14PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2232
> >
> >FreeBSD's openpam doesn't have a built in way of ignoring an unknown
> >user (e.g. treating PAM_USER_UNKNOWN as a pass for a required m
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:00:08AM -0500, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2232
>
> FreeBSD's openpam doesn't have a built in way of ignoring an unknown
> user (e.g. treating PAM_USER_UNKNOWN as a pass for a required module,
> like Linux's user_unknown=ignore tag), so t
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Pete Fritchman wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2232
FreeBSD's openpam doesn't have a built in way of ignoring an unknown
user (e.g. treating PAM_USER_UNKNOWN as a pass for a required module,
like Linux's user_unknown=ignore tag), so there needs to be an
ignore_un
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2232
FreeBSD's openpam doesn't have a built in way of ignoring an unknown
user (e.g. treating PAM_USER_UNKNOWN as a pass for a required module,
like Linux's user_unknown=ignore tag), so there needs to be an
ignore_unknown_user flag built in to the PAM module. T
15 matches
Mail list logo