Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

2009-11-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 02:48 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/20/2009 02:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: >> They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. > >> Simo. > > Ack. > > A note to QA: when this patch is pushed it will probably cause a lot of > trou

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

2009-11-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 02:48 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/20/2009 02:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: >> They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. > >> Simo. > > Ack. > > A note to QA: when this patch is pushed it will probably cause a lot of > trou

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

2009-11-20 Thread Jenny Galipeau
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/20/2009 02:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >> They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. >> >> Simo. >> > > Ack. > > A note to QA: when this patch is pushed it will probably cause a lot of > trouble with

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

2009-11-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 02:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. > > Simo. Ack. A note to QA: when this patch is pushed it will probably cause a lot of trouble with the tests. It may be up to 10 seconds before the SSSD

[SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

2009-11-20 Thread Simo Sorce
They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York >From bcd36543f40ac48f944970735eddfd37f9cf9ab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simo Sorce Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:19:35 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Raise some timeouts When using high debug levels or v