Hi Stephen,
On 12/18/2013 07:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Nikolai, has there been any progress on this? I'd actually really like
to see these changes land, as they'll make my life easier as I work on
journald support for the debug logs.
What I'm looking for is mostly the variadic change (so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 17 Oct 2013 05:23:36 AM EDT, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 12:16 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 07:19 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:42:05AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Finally if everybody a
On 10/17/2013 12:16 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 10/15/2013 07:19 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:42:05AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Finally if everybody agree they want to make this huge change, *then* I
absolutely want to see each change also change debug numbers from
num
On 10/15/2013 07:19 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:42:05AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Finally if everybody agree they want to make this huge change, *then* I
absolutely want to see each change also change debug numbers from
numbers to the new macros. It makes no sense whatsoeve
On 10/15/2013 07:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:42:05AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Finally if everybody agree they want to make this huge change, *then* I
absolutely want to see each change also change debug numbers from
numbers to the new macros. It makes no sense whatsoeve
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:42:05AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Finally if everybody agree they want to make this huge change, *then* I
> absolutely want to see each change also change debug numbers from
> numbers to the new macros. It makes no sense whatsoever to change the
> DEBUG form and leave in
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:42:05AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 15:21 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:53:11AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 11:09 +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > > > On 10/10/2013 11:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
On 10/11/2013 10:09 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:46 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/2013 10:07 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Make DEBUG macro accept variable number of ar
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 15:21 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:53:11AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 11:09 +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > > On 10/10/2013 11:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:46 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:53:11AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 11:09 +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > On 10/10/2013 11:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:46 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > >> Hash: SHA1
> >
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 11:09 +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 11:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:46 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 10/10/2013 10:07 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >>> Make DEB
On 10/11/2013 11:25 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 10/11/2013 11:23 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 10/11/2013 11:17 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Can you also send the next round of patches gzipped so that you don't
have to wait until they make it through moderation?
Sure, I will.
Although, IM
On 10/11/2013 11:23 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 10/11/2013 11:17 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Can you also send the next round of patches gzipped so that you don't
have to wait until they make it through moderation?
Sure, I will.
Although, IMHO, it makes it harder to respond to particular pat
On 10/11/2013 11:17 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Can you also send the next round of patches gzipped so that you don't
have to wait until they make it through moderation?
Sure, I will.
Although, IMHO, it makes it harder to respond to particular patches and
snippets and discuss effectively.
Sincere
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:09:35AM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 11:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:46 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>On 10/10/2013 10:07 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >>>Make D
On 10/10/2013 11:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:46 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/2013 10:07 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Make DEBUG macro accept variable number of arguments, thus removing
the need to wrap the format
Hi Stephen,
On 10/10/2013 10:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/2013 10:07 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Make DEBUG macro accept variable number of arguments, thus removing
the need to wrap the format string and its arguments into parens
on i
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:46 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/10/2013 10:07 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > Make DEBUG macro accept variable number of arguments, thus removing
> > the need to wrap the format string and its arguments into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/2013 10:07 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Make DEBUG macro accept variable number of arguments, thus removing
> the need to wrap the format string and its arguments into parens
> on invocation.
Nack.
Please do us a favor and split this into
19 matches
Mail list logo