Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Fixes for sysdb upgrades

2011-08-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:22 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > > I noticed two issues with sysdb upgrades: > > > > Patch 0001: If the transaction failed to commit for any reason, we were > > not cancelling it. This could leave the LDB in an unusable state. > > > > Patch 0002: There was a double-free in s

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Fixes for sysdb upgrades

2011-08-10 Thread Jan Zelený
> I noticed two issues with sysdb upgrades: > > Patch 0001: If the transaction failed to commit for any reason, we were > not cancelling it. This could leave the LDB in an unusable state. > > Patch 0002: There was a double-free in sysdb_domain_init_internal(), > since tmp_ctx was allocated as a c

[SSSD] [PATCHES] Fixes for sysdb upgrades

2011-08-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
I noticed two issues with sysdb upgrades: Patch 0001: If the transaction failed to commit for any reason, we were not cancelling it. This could leave the LDB in an unusable state. Patch 0002: There was a double-free in sysdb_domain_init_internal(), since tmp_ctx was allocated as a child of ctx. F