On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 10:21 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 15:20 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > > On 07/29/2011 08:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > > >> Considering that it may be a lot of work to regroup the patches, I
> > > > >> think
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > it may be even bett
> On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 15:20 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > On 07/29/2011 08:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > >> Considering that it may be a lot of work to regroup the patches, I
> > > >> think
> > > >>
> > > >> > it may be even better to have squash 40-43 and 44-46 together, but
> > > >> > a patc
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 15:20 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On 07/29/2011 08:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > >> Considering that it may be a lot of work to regroup the patches, I think
> > >>
> > >> > it may be even better to have squash 40-43 and 44-46 together, but a
> > >> > patch that does not compi
> On 07/29/2011 08:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> >> Considering that it may be a lot of work to regroup the patches, I think
> >>
> >> > it may be even better to have squash 40-43 and 44-46 together, but a
> >> > patch that does not compile seems bad to me.
> >
> > This sounds reasonable. Should I d
On 07/29/2011 08:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>> Considering that it may be a lot of work to regroup the patches, I think
>> > it may be even better to have squash 40-43 and 44-46 together, but a
>> > patch that does not compile seems bad to me.
> This sounds reasonable. Should I do the job and send th
> On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 08:39 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > On 07/20/2011 12:58 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > > I'm sending several patches with the sysdb refactoring. Originally, I
> > > > was planning one more step - to change return type from int to
> > > > errno_t where it was convenient. If som
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 08:39 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On 07/20/2011 12:58 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > I'm sending several patches with the sysdb refactoring. Originally, I was
> > > planning one more step - to change return type from int to errno_t where
> > > it was convenient. If someone wants
> On 07/20/2011 12:58 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > I'm sending several patches with the sysdb refactoring. Originally, I was
> > planning one more step - to change return type from int to errno_t where
> > it was convenient. If someone wants to do it, feel free. Otherwise I'm
> > going to make the pat
On 07/20/2011 12:58 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> I'm sending several patches with the sysdb refactoring. Originally, I was
> planning one more step - to change return type from int to errno_t where it
> was convenient. If someone wants to do it, feel free. Otherwise I'm going to
> make the patch myse
I'm sending several patches with the sysdb refactoring. Originally, I was
planning one more step - to change return type from int to errno_t where it
was convenient. If someone wants to do it, feel free. Otherwise I'm going to
make the patch myself in couple days.
When reviewing, please note th
10 matches
Mail list logo
