On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 13:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:00 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > ah, sorry, after I while I realized that I forgot to squeeze in the
> > changes to the IPA provider. New patches attached.
>
> Changes look good, I'm no longer seeing any issues w
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:00 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> ah, sorry, after I while I realized that I forgot to squeeze in the
> changes to the IPA provider. New patches attached.
Changes look good, I'm no longer seeing any issues with FreeIPA.
Ack.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:24:45AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 13:42 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently we have two competing features in the LDAP provider. One the
> > one hand we want to avoid further DNS lookups by the OpenLDAP client
> > libraries an
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 13:42 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently we have two competing features in the LDAP provider. One the
> one hand we want to avoid further DNS lookups by the OpenLDAP client
> libraries and want to talk to the same LDAP server as long as possible.
> To achieve this w
Hi,
currently we have two competing features in the LDAP provider. One the
one hand we want to avoid further DNS lookups by the OpenLDAP client
libraries and want to talk to the same LDAP server as long as possible.
To achieve this we create LDAP URIs with the IP instead of the server
name and pas
