On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:54:55AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:42:43AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > >Thanks for the review. New weightless patches are attached.
> >
> > Oops, I didn't save the header file. Another respin is attached.
> >
> > Also if anyone will ever
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:42:43AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >Thanks for the review. New weightless patches are attached.
>
> Oops, I didn't save the header file. Another respin is attached.
>
> Also if anyone will ever need slinklist implementation, I have it
> backed up at: fedorapeople.org
On 09/04/2013 10:23 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 09/04/2013 10:01 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:26:09PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
Yes, I don't have a problem with that. As long as priority and weight
are honored.
I have done it AD only after all. Enabling it for all prov
On 09/04/2013 10:01 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:26:09PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
Yes, I don't have a problem with that. As long as priority and weight
are honored.
I have done it AD only after all. Enabling it for all providers
required more changes than expected. I d
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:26:09PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >Yes, I don't have a problem with that. As long as priority and weight
> >are honored.
>
> I have done it AD only after all. Enabling it for all providers
> required more changes than expected. I don't think those changes
> should be
On 08/26/2013 12:15 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:08:56PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/23/2013 07:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:36:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/23/2013 05:44 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:24:17PM
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:08:56PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 08/23/2013 07:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:36:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>On 08/23/2013 05:44 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On
On 08/23/2013 07:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:36:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/23/2013 05:44 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/08/2013 03:32 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0200, Lu
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:36:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 08/23/2013 05:44 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>On 08/08/2013 03:32 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>[..]
> >>>
On 08/23/2013 05:44 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/08/2013 03:32 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
[..]
nitpicking some more given Lucas nacked.
+static errno_t ad_sort_servers(struct a
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 03:32 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >[..]
> >nitpicking some more given Lucas nacked.
> >
> >>>+static errno_t ad_sort_servers(struct ares_srv_reply **list, void *pv
On 08/08/2013 03:32 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
[..]
nitpicking some more given Lucas nacked.
+static errno_t ad_sort_servers(struct ares_srv_reply **list, void *pvt)
+{
+struct ad_srv_plugin_state *state = NULL;
+struct ares_srv_reply
On 08/07/2013 01:56 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (06/08/13 14:43), Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/06/2013 10:20 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (05/08/13 15:24), Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2001
There is a bug in underlying resolv_sort_srv_reply(). It sometimes
return
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
[..]
nitpicking some more given Lucas nacked.
> >+static errno_t ad_sort_servers(struct ares_srv_reply **list, void *pvt)
> >+{
> >+struct ad_srv_plugin_state *state = NULL;
> >+struct ares_srv_reply dummy[3] = {{NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0
On (06/08/13 14:43), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 08/06/2013 10:20 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (05/08/13 15:24), Pavel Březina wrote:
>>>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2001
>>>
>>>There is a bug in underlying resolv_sort_srv_reply(). It sometimes
>>>returns less servers than there is on the i
On 08/06/2013 10:20 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (05/08/13 15:24), Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2001
There is a bug in underlying resolv_sort_srv_reply(). It sometimes
returns less servers than there is on the input. This seems to be
related to configuration when t
On (05/08/13 15:24), Pavel Březina wrote:
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2001
>
>There is a bug in underlying resolv_sort_srv_reply(). It sometimes
>returns less servers than there is on the input. This seems to be
>related to configuration when two servers has the same priority and
>weight
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2001
There is a bug in underlying resolv_sort_srv_reply(). It sometimes
returns less servers than there is on the input. This seems to be
related to configuration when two servers has the same priority and
weight (0). I haven't found the root cause yet, I'l
18 matches
Mail list logo
