[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-09-05 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() jhrozek commented: """ * master: 59db26782d052ddbec633279d08e8627ca57fd41 e3d9ce0ac22796cb08ad2daed006021b44b28c69 4c508463be960682cf94b4e5a39be2f8f49067c8 a5e9d34fd39c0061ca284674a6fd7cad05c6056c 9a44e78

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-09-05 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() lslebodn commented: """ @jhrozek LGTM. I would appreciate more unit test for corner cases but that can be done later. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301#issuecomment-3271

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-09-04 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() jhrozek commented: """ ACK from me after the changes. The last patch now introduces a slight change in behaviour in the sense that the DN was not sanitized, but I would call that a fix :-) Adding accep

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-09-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() fidencio commented: """ @lslebodn, patch set has been updated! Please, if there's still something that you don't agree, feel free to just push directly to my branch during the time I'll be off. """ See

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-09-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() fidencio commented: """ @lslebodn, you're right. We do sanitize the dn before passing to both functions. I'll update the patches soon, thanks for noticing this. """ See the full comment at https://gith

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-09-01 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() lslebodn commented: """ BTW 1st part of commit tile is usually component (e.g. IPA/AD/SDAP/LDAP/SYSDB ...) and not C file. But it is not a blocker if it will not be changed. """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-09-01 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() lslebodn commented: """ I noticed that we sanitize DN on few places before passing it to `sysdb_search_groups_by_orig_dn`. I thing we should not rely on caller function and sanitize it within `sysdb_sea

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-08-31 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() jhrozek commented: """ CI: http://vm-058-233.XXX/logs/job/74/95/summary.html """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301#issuecomment-326501909

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-08-31 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() fidencio commented: """ Added a simple patch with tests! """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301#issuecomment-326353798 ___ sssd-dev

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-08-31 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() fidencio commented: """ Okay. I'll write the tests and update the patch set (if not Tomorrow, in a week or so), """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301#issuecomment-326335150

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-08-31 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() jhrozek commented: """ btw functional testing passed. I couldn't resolve supplemental groups of AD users at one point, but I couldn't reproduce it afterwards and because I do all my testing on a single

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-08-31 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() jhrozek commented: """ And additionally, a new function calls for a unit test in the sysdb tests.. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301#issuecomment-326320682 __

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-08-31 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() jhrozek commented: """ Actually, I also missed this previously: ``` /sssd/src/db/sysdb_ops.c: In function ‘sysdb_search_by_orig_dn’: /sssd/src/db/sysdb_ops.c:3265:20: warning: unused variable ‘basedn’ [-

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-07-27 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() fidencio commented: """ Patch set has been updated. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301#issuecomment-318327223 ___ sssd-devel ma

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-06-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() fidencio commented: """ This patchset introduced a few issues in our integration tests. As they're not high prio I'm adding "Changes requested" label and will revisit those later on ... """ See the ful

[SSSD] [sssd PR#301][comment] Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn()

2017-06-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301 Title: #301: Introduce sysdb_search_by_orig_dn() fidencio commented: """ This patchset has **no priority** and does **not** need a quick review! """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/301#issuecomment-307026134 _