URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
jhrozek commented:
"""
* master: 39d6a3be119b050b0690152b6b443117c8617b1c
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432#issuecomment-343970599
___
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
fidencio commented:
"""
@justin-stephenson, nice, thanks!
I'm adding the "Accepted" label to this PR based on the discussion we had
during the team meeting and in the feedback provided by @j
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
justin-stephenson commented:
"""
@fidencio man page verbiage looks good to me.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432#issuecomment-343960502
__
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
Here is the issue that tracks the email in 'nameAlias' attribute issue:
https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3567
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/s
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
fidencio commented:
"""
Just for the record. We had a meeting Yesterday and we discussed this PR
face-to-face in order to speed the process up and do not block it.
@lslebodn's worries **do**
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
On 11/03/2017 05:41 PM, lslebodn wrote:
> On (03/11/17 16:19), mzidek-rh wrote:
> >No, I used good example. Your example is the wrong one and would not
> trigger the
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (03/11/17 16:36), mzidek-rh wrote:
>Sorry, but this:
>```
>(Fri Nov 3 15:52:42 2017) [sssd[nss]] [sysdb_getpwnam] (0x0020): Search for
>[ema...@ipadomain.test] ret
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (03/11/17 16:19), mzidek-rh wrote:
>No, I used good example. Your example is the wrong one and would not trigger
>the error.
>
There are more ways how you can sto
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
Sorry, but this:
```
(Fri Nov 3 15:52:42 2017) [sssd[nss]] [sysdb_getpwnam] (0x0020): Search for
[ema...@ipadomain.test] returned multiple results. It can be an emai
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (03/11/17 15:21), mzidek-rh wrote:
>About logging message to syslog. I am not against it. I wanted to solve it by
>MAN + DEBUG. MAN + DEBUG + SYSLOG, looked like o
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
No, I used good example. Your example is the wrong one and would not trigger
the error.
What do you think will happen if in my example scenario I search for 'getent
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (03/11/17 15:06), mzidek-rh wrote:
>It will not generate the message you wrote.
>It will never show shortname in the output.
Yes, I forgot to use fqname there. But
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
About logging message to syslog. I am not against it. I wanted to solve it by
MAN + DEBUG. MAN + DEBUG + SYSLOG, looked like overkill to me, especially
given that w
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
You are wrong.
It will not generate the message you wrote.
It will never show shortname in the output.
It will not generate the error if you search by username that is
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (03/11/17 14:26), mzidek-rh wrote:
>mzidek-rh commented on this pull request.
>> @@ -218,6 +218,21 @@ int sysdb_getpwnam(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
> goto done;
>
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
I added a note to the commit message.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432#issuecomment-341719462
__
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
lslebodn commented:
"""
BTW all non-clear parts which were explained in PR should have been part of
commit message.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432#issuec
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
By namealias I meant SYSDB_NAME_ALIAS if it was not clear.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432#issuecomment-341698043
_
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
The problem is with multiple users sharing the same email in LDAP/IPA. The
email attribute from LDAP is stored twice in the local SYSDB database.
Once as the SYSDB_U
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
lslebodn commented:
"""
>You are wrong. As I wrote in one of the previous comments:
>"Just a note, we do not use SYSDB_USER_EMAIL in getpwnam searches. We
>lowercase the attribute >and store
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
lslebodn commented:
"""
>You are wrong. As I wrote in one of the previous comments:
>"Just a note, we do not use SYSDB_USER_EMAIL in getpwnam searches. We
>lowercase the attribute >and store
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
You are wrong. As I wrote in one of the previous comments:
"Just a note, we do not use SYSDB_USER_EMAIL in getpwnam searches. We lowercase
the attribute and store it
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432
Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts
lslebodn commented:
"""
I'm sorry the error message is still vague and it will not fix the bug.
NACK.
`SYSDB_USER_EMAIL` is part of attributes requested in `SYSDB_PW_ATTRS` and used
in
many
23 matches
Mail list logo
