URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/551
Title: #551: GPO: Fix bug with empty GPO rules
fidencio commented:
"""
master:
e6e5fe3
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/551#issuecomment-384948486
___
sssd-devel mailing list
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/551
Title: #551: GPO: Fix bug with empty GPO rules
jhrozek commented:
"""
The GPO automated RHEL passed (Job ID:2432777). I haven't done the manual tests
yet to verify this bug.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/551
Title: #551: GPO: Fix bug with empty GPO rules
jhrozek commented:
"""
OK, I will test and review this PR.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/551#issuecomment-382315559
___
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/551
Title: #551: GPO: Fix bug with empty GPO rules
rdratlos commented:
"""
Hi Michal,,
of course your PR should continue to be reviewed. My intention was just to
present an alternative approach based on some analysis half a year ago that
guided me to SID
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/551
Title: #551: GPO: Fix bug with empty GPO rules
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
Hi @rdratlos ,
the PR #552 does not solve the problem described in issue
https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3680 .
The changes made in that PR seem to be unrelated to the empty
