URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/767
Title: #767: be: remember last good server's name instead of fo_server structure
pbrezina commented:
"""
1.16: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/784
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/767#issuecomment-474785091
_
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/767
Title: #767: be: remember last good server's name instead of fo_server structure
pbrezina commented:
"""
Given that `last_good_srv` is not used anywhere else I'd rather not touch more
code to fix this issue. But in general I agree.
"""
See the full co
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/767
Title: #767: be: remember last good server's name instead of fo_server structure
jhrozek commented:
"""
* master: 735af71a8e169f17fa5462db610a1567c9618e29
@pbrezina this also needs a backport, can you open a separate PR against
sssd-1-16?
"""
See the
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/767
Title: #767: be: remember last good server's name instead of fo_server structure
jhrozek commented:
"""
@pbrezina what do you think about the last comment?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/767#issuecomment-474600814
__
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/767
Title: #767: be: remember last good server's name instead of fo_server structure
jhrozek commented:
"""
So I don't have a problem accepting this patch in the meantime, also
considering that it fixed an issue for a customer, but I wonder if a better
ap
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/767
Title: #767: be: remember last good server's name instead of fo_server structure
pbrezina commented:
"""
I gave scratch build to customer and I'm waiting for confirmation.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/767#issuecomment-
