On 04/20/2012 09:44 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 20:05 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 19:48 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>
>>> The question is about the ALLOW and DETECT options. As a result of the
>>> merge operation using those options one can end up with m
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 20:05 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 19:48 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>
> > The question is about the ALLOW and DETECT options. As a result of the
> > merge operation using those options one can end up with more than one
> > section with the same name o
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 08:05:16PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 19:48 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>
> > The question is about the ALLOW and DETECT options. As a result of the
> > merge operation using those options one can end up with more than one
> > section with the same
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 19:48 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> The question is about the ALLOW and DETECT options. As a result of the
> merge operation using those options one can end up with more than one
> section with the same name or more than one key with the same name
> inside the same section. The
Hi,
I started looking at the final patch to do the merging of the sections
and thus two independent config files in INI. I looked at the patch I
started a year ago. Looks like a reasonable start however I have a question.
Right now entirely from the POW of completeness the following merge
option
