On 12/06/2013 03:15 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:46:54PM -0500, Yassir Elley wrote:
>> I agree with your assessment. I have changed the recommendation in the
>> Design Doc to read as follows:
>> "In order to avoid premature optimization, the team's recommendation is to
>>
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:46:54PM -0500, Yassir Elley wrote:
> I agree with your assessment. I have changed the recommendation in the Design
> Doc to read as follows:
> "In order to avoid premature optimization, the team's recommendation is to
> start by implementing the straightforward approach
- Original Message -
> On 12/05/2013 12:37 PM, Yassir Elley wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 10:24 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> >>> On 12/04/2013 10:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 21:28 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > My point is
On 12/05/2013 12:37 PM, Yassir Elley wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 10:24 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>> On 12/04/2013 10:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 21:28 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> My point is that the whole page should be about AD acces
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 10:24 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > On 12/04/2013 10:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 21:28 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > >> My point is that the whole page should be about AD access provider and
> > >> the GPO is its implemen
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 10:24 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 10:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 21:28 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> >> My point is that the whole page should be about AD access provider and
> >> the GPO is its implementation detail not a generic mechanism.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/05/2013 10:24 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 10:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 21:28 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>> My point is that the whole page should be about AD access
>>> provider and the GPO is its implementation d
On 12/04/2013 10:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 21:28 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> My point is that the whole page should be about AD access provider and
>> the GPO is its implementation detail not a generic mechanism.
>> There can be a separate page where you can describe how GPO
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:58:31PM -0500, Yassir Elley wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 12/03/2013 12:38 PM, Yassir Elley wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have written up a Design Document for GPO Integration with the AD Provider
> > [1]. The Document includ
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 21:28 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> My point is that the whole page should be about AD access provider and
> the GPO is its implementation detail not a generic mechanism.
> There can be a separate page where you can describe how GPO generally
> works and reference it. Right now t
On 12/04/2013 05:58 PM, Yassir Elley wrote:
>
> 2) IMO it should be stated as a clear non goal to create a pluggable CSE
> framework on the client at least at the moment and extend it on case by case
> basis.
> Although the intent is to only implement one CSE plugin module for the first
> implemen
Comments inline.
- Original Message -
> On 12/03/2013 12:38 PM, Yassir Elley wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have written up a Design Document for GPO Integration with the AD Provider
> [1]. The Document includes the design, as well as some Unresolved Issues.
> Your review of the document wo
On 12/03/2013 12:38 PM, Yassir Elley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have written up a Design Document for GPO Integration with the AD Provider
> [1]. The Document includes the design, as well as some Unresolved Issues.
> Your review of the document would be greatly appreciated (and especially your
> inp
Hi all,
I have written up a Design Document for GPO Integration with the AD Provider
[1]. The Document includes the design, as well as some Unresolved Issues. Your
review of the document would be greatly appreciated (and especially your input
on the Unresolved Issues)!
Thanks,
Yassir.
[1] htt
14 matches
Mail list logo
