Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Dmitri Pal
Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:11:47 -0400 > Dmitri Pal wrote: > > >> Simo Sorce wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:29:33 -0400 >>> Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> >>> >>> If you remove interfaces, please remember to bump the soname. >>>

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:11:47 -0400 Dmitri Pal wrote: > Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:29:33 -0400 > > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > > >> If you remove interfaces, please remember to bump the soname. > >> > > > > Have we declared the ABI stable already for that lib ? > >

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Dmitri Pal
Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:29:33 -0400 > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > >> If you remove interfaces, please remember to bump the soname. >> > > Have we declared the ABI stable already for that lib ? > > Simo. > > Yes. Other than the experimental functions, yes. The interf

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:29:33 -0400 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > If you remove interfaces, please remember to bump the soname. Have we declared the ABI stable already for that lib ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York ___ sssd-devel mailing

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Dmitri Pal
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 03/26/2010 11:23 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> On 03/26/2010 10:25 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > >>> Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 03/26/2010 05:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > > On 03/25/2010 11:12 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > >>> Any objectio

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/26/2010 11:23 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 03/26/2010 10:25 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: >>> Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 03/26/2010 05:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On 03/25/2010 11:12 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: >>> Any

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Dmitri Pal
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 03/26/2010 10:25 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> On 03/26/2010 05:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >>> On 03/25/2010 11:12 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > Any objections if I do this when I have a spare moment? > >>>^ > >> > Does a

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/26/2010 10:25 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 03/26/2010 05:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>> On 03/25/2010 11:12 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > Any objections if I do this when I have a spare moment? >>>^ >> >> >

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Dmitri Pal
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 03/26/2010 05:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > > On 03/25/2010 11:12 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > >>> Any objections if I do this when I have a spare moment? > >^ > > > > >> Does anybody care? > > > My bet is that there were no objections so the silence mea

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/26/2010 05:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On 03/25/2010 11:12 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: >>> Any objections if I do this when I have a spare moment? > >^ > >> Does anybody care? > > > My bet is that there were no objections

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-26 Thread Jakub Hrozek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/25/2010 11:12 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: >> Any objections if I do this when I have a spare moment? ^ >> > >> > >> > > Does anybody care? > My bet is that there were no objections so the silence meant "go ahead" :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNAT

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-25 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:12:13 -0400 Dmitri Pal wrote: > Dmitri Pal wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently the INI interface includes the following functions: > > > > int config_from_file (const char *application, const char > > *config_filename, struct collection_item **ini_config, int > > error_level,

Re: [SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-25 Thread Dmitri Pal
Dmitri Pal wrote: > Hi, > > Currently the INI interface includes the following functions: > > int config_from_file (const char *application, const char *config_filename, > struct collection_item **ini_config, int error_level, > struct collection_item **er

[SSSD] Design proposal about INI interface improvements

2010-03-24 Thread Dmitri Pal
Hi, Currently the INI interface includes the following functions: int config_from_file (const char *application, const char *config_filename, struct collection_item **ini_config, int error_level, struct collection_item **error_list) Read configura