On 03/06/2012 07:14 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 18:55 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 03/06/2012 03:52 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> The ding-libs development on master has been virtually stagnant for many
>>> months now. Much of what is included on the master branch is
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 18:55 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 03/06/2012 03:52 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > The ding-libs development on master has been virtually stagnant for many
> > months now. Much of what is included on the master branch is
> > partially-completed concept work that was origin
On 03/06/2012 03:52 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> The ding-libs development on master has been virtually stagnant for many
> months now. Much of what is included on the master branch is
> partially-completed concept work that was originally going to be done as
> part of a nebulous 1.0 future.
>
>
The ding-libs development on master has been virtually stagnant for many
months now. Much of what is included on the master branch is
partially-completed concept work that was originally going to be done as
part of a nebulous 1.0 future.
Given that the ding-libs 1.0 has been effectively abandoned
