On (07/04/16 11:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:12:17AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (06/04/16 15:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I was doing a smoke-test with Windows Server 2016 after receiving
>> >several requests from users (mainly about IDMU deprecation) a
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:12:17AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (06/04/16 15:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I was doing a smoke-test with Windows Server 2016 after receiving
> >several requests from users (mainly about IDMU deprecation) and find out
> >that WS 2016 reports a higher Do
On (07/04/16 09:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (06/04/16 15:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I was doing a smoke-test with Windows Server 2016 after receiving
>>several requests from users (mainly about IDMU deprecation) and find out
>>that WS 2016 reports a higher Domain Compatibility level.
>
On (06/04/16 15:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was doing a smoke-test with Windows Server 2016 after receiving
>several requests from users (mainly about IDMU deprecation) and find out
>that WS 2016 reports a higher Domain Compatibility level.
>
>Even though that Windows Server release is not o
