[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-18 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (17/08/16 16:32), Petr Cech wrote: >On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: >> On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: >> > On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: >> > > > On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephens

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-18 Thread Pavel Březina
On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin S

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-17 Thread Petr Cech
On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin S

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-17 Thread Justin Stephenson
On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin Stephenson Thanks, Justin. Obviously ACK. Umm.

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-17 Thread Pavel Březina
On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin Stephenson Thanks, Justin. Obviously ACK. Umm..I'm by no means a UI designer, but does HINT

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-16 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: > On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: > > Updated patch attached. > > > > Kind regards, > > Justin Stephenson > > Thanks, Justin. > > Obviously ACK. Umm..I'm by no means a UI designer, but does HINT in ALL CAPS look awkward

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-16 Thread Petr Cech
On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin Stephenson Thanks, Justin. Obviously ACK. On 08/16/2016 02:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (12/08/16 12:24), Justin Stephenson wrote: Simple error message patch, resolves https://fedorahosted.o

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-16 Thread Justin Stephenson
Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin Stephenson On 08/16/2016 02:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (12/08/16 12:24), Justin Stephenson wrote: Simple error message patch, resolves https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130 Kind regards, Justin Stephenson >From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0b

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-15 Thread Petr Cech
On 08/16/2016 08:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (12/08/16 12:24), Justin Stephenson wrote: Simple error message patch, resolves https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130 Kind regards, Justin Stephenson From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Justin St

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-15 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (12/08/16 12:24), Justin Stephenson wrote: >Simple error message patch, resolves >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130 > >Kind regards, > >Justin Stephenson > >From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Justin Stephenson >Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-15 Thread Justin Stephenson
Thanks Petr! Kind regards, Justin Stephenson On 08/15/2016 02:13 AM, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/15/2016 07:58 AM, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/12/2016 06:24 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Simple error message patch, resolves https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130 Kind regards, Justin Stephenson

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-14 Thread Petr Cech
On 08/15/2016 07:58 AM, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/12/2016 06:24 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Simple error message patch, resolves https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130 Kind regards, Justin Stephenson 0001-SSSCTL-More-helpful-error-message-when-InfoPipe-is-d.patch From 080f9639e120329d069d

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-14 Thread Petr Cech
On 08/12/2016 06:24 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Simple error message patch, resolves https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130 Kind regards, Justin Stephenson 0001-SSSCTL-More-helpful-error-message-when-InfoPipe-is-d.patch From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2