On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 07:02:19PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:58:49PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> > On 06/27/2016 04:18 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 03:05:54PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > > It depends on which patches will be pushed to
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:58:49PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 06/27/2016 04:18 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 03:05:54PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > It depends on which patches will be pushed to master.
> > > but I was able to apply patch from this thread with 3way
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:46:33AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (23/06/16 11:03), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (20/06/16 21:09), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>> ehlo,
> >>>
> >>> Attached is a sligtly modified version of Michal's
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:57:02AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:25:41AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > It looks like there is an agreement that we needn't change anything in
> > libini_config for this use-case. So I will focus on other ding-libs patches.
> >
> > BTW I
On 06/27/2016 04:18 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 03:05:54PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
It depends on which patches will be pushed to master.
but I was able to apply patch from this thread with 3way merge
on Pavel's sssctl branch from fedorapeople; there weren't any conflict
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 03:05:54PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> It depends on which patches will be pushed to master.
> but I was able to apply patch from this thread with 3way merge
> on Pavel's sssctl branch from fedorapeople; there weren't any conflicts
The latest ones on the list. I will pu
On (27/06/16 14:00), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:55:14PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
>> On 06/24/2016 02:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > On (24/06/16 13:51), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > > On (24/06/16 13:49), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > > > On (24/06/16 10:29), Michal Židek wr
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:55:14PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 02:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (24/06/16 13:51), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > On (24/06/16 13:49), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > > On (24/06/16 10:29), Michal Židek wrote:
> > > > > On 06/24/2016 09:57 AM, Jakub H
On 06/24/2016 02:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/06/16 13:51), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/06/16 13:49), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/06/16 10:29), Michal Židek wrote:
On 06/24/2016 09:57 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:04:21PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
On 06/23/2
On (24/06/16 13:51), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (24/06/16 13:49), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (24/06/16 10:29), Michal Židek wrote:
>>>On 06/24/2016 09:57 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:04:21PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 06/23/2016 09:40 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>
On (24/06/16 13:49), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (24/06/16 10:29), Michal Židek wrote:
>>On 06/24/2016 09:57 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:04:21PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
>>> > On 06/23/2016 09:40 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:34PM +0200, J
On (24/06/16 10:29), Michal Židek wrote:
>On 06/24/2016 09:57 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:04:21PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
>> > On 06/23/2016 09:40 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:34PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016
On 06/24/2016 09:57 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:04:21PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
On 06/23/2016 09:40 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:34PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:29:13PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/06/16 18:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:04:21PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 06/23/2016 09:40 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:34PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:29:13PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > > On (23/06/16 18:59), Michal Židek wrote:
> > >
On 06/23/2016 09:40 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:34PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:29:13PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/06/16 18:59), Michal Židek wrote:
On 06/23/2016 06:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/06/16 18:24), Michal Židek
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:34PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:29:13PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (23/06/16 18:59), Michal Židek wrote:
> > >On 06/23/2016 06:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >> On (23/06/16 18:24), Michal Židek wrote:
> > >> > On 06/23/2016 05
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:29:13PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (23/06/16 18:59), Michal Židek wrote:
> >On 06/23/2016 06:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (23/06/16 18:24), Michal Židek wrote:
> >> > On 06/23/2016 05:50 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> >> > > Lukas,
> >> > >
> >> > > did you h
On (23/06/16 18:59), Michal Židek wrote:
>On 06/23/2016 06:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (23/06/16 18:24), Michal Židek wrote:
>> > On 06/23/2016 05:50 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
>> > > Lukas,
>> > >
>> > > did you have some local patches related to
>> > > this patch, that you did not send here
On 06/23/2016 06:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/06/16 18:24), Michal Židek wrote:
On 06/23/2016 05:50 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Lukas,
did you have some local patches related to
this patch, that you did not send here?
Because I can not apply the patch on current
master and the changes in
On (23/06/16 18:24), Michal Židek wrote:
>On 06/23/2016 05:50 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
>> Lukas,
>>
>> did you have some local patches related to
>> this patch, that you did not send here?
>>
>> Because I can not apply the patch on current
>> master and the changes in the context of
>> your patch
On 06/23/2016 05:50 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Lukas,
did you have some local patches related to
this patch, that you did not send here?
Because I can not apply the patch on current
master and the changes in the context of
your patch seem like you did something with
default config file path?
Slig
Lukas,
did you have some local patches related to
this patch, that you did not send here?
Because I can not apply the patch on current
master and the changes in the context of
your patch seem like you did something with
default config file path?
Slightly modified version that applies on
current
On (23/06/16 11:51), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:46:33AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (23/06/16 11:03), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >On (20/06/16 21:09), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >>On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >>> ehlo,
>> >>>
>> >>> At
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:46:33AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (23/06/16 11:03), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (20/06/16 21:09), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>> ehlo,
> >>>
> >>> Attached is a sligtly modified version of Michal's
On (23/06/16 11:03), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (20/06/16 21:09), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> ehlo,
>>>
>>> Attached is a sligtly modified version of Michal's patch.
>>
>>The same patch is attached twice. Was it by accident or did you
On (20/06/16 21:09), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> Attached is a sligtly modified version of Michal's patch.
>
>The same patch is attached twice. Was it by accident or did you mean to
>send two patches?
>
>> I fixed few coding
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:25:41AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> It looks like there is an agreement that we needn't change anything in
> libini_config for this use-case. So I will focus on other ding-libs patches.
>
> BTW I need to update manual pages to reflect this change.
>
Please file a t
On (20/06/16 16:13), Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>On 06/20/2016 03:09 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> ehlo,
>>>
>>> Attached is a sligtly modified version of Michal's patch.
>>
>> The same patch is attached twice. Was it by accident or d
On 06/20/2016 03:09 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> Attached is a sligtly modified version of Michal's patch.
>
> The same patch is attached twice. Was it by accident or did you mean to
> send two patches?
>
>> I fixed few
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> Attached is a sligtly modified version of Michal's patch.
The same patch is attached twice. Was it by accident or did you mean to
send two patches?
> I fixed few coding style issues + added missing creation of directory
30 matches
Mail list logo
