On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:35:26AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:25:20AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (10/08/16 09:13), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > >On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik
> > >wrote:
> > >> ehlo,
> > >>
> > >> yet
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:25:20AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (10/08/16 09:13), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> yet another oneliner.
> >> It reminds me that we should generate either schema or
>
On (10/08/16 09:13), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> yet another oneliner.
>> It reminds me that we should generate either schema or
>> data for python test.
>
>LGTM. Although, I'm not sure what you mean by
On (10/08/16 09:13), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> yet another oneliner.
>> It reminds me that we should generate either schema or
>> data for python test.
>
>LGTM. Although, I'm not sure what you mean by
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> yet another oneliner.
> It reminds me that we should generate either schema or
> data for python test.
LGTM. Although, I'm not sure what you mean by generating either schema
or data for python tests.
>
> LS