On (09/01/17 09:43), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 13:35 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:25:48PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> > On 01/08/2017 09:44 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> > > People,
>> > >
>> > > Recently I've faced some issues when testing the socket
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 13:35 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:25:48PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > On 01/08/2017 09:44 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > People,
> > >
> > > Recently I've faced some issues when testing the socket-activation
> > > working running as sssd-use
On 01/09/2017 01:38 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:25:48PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 01/08/2017 09:44 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
People,
Recently I've faced some issues when testing the socket-activation
workin
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:25:48PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> On 01/08/2017 09:44 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> > People,
>> >
>> > Recently I've faced some issues when testing the socket-activation
>> > working running as sssd-user, which
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:25:48PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 01/08/2017 09:44 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > People,
> >
> > Recently I've faced some issues when testing the socket-activation
> > working running as sssd-user, which will force me to take a different
> > path for a few thing
On 01/08/2017 09:44 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
People,
Recently I've faced some issues when testing the socket-activation
working running as sssd-user, which will force me to take a different
path for a few things and I really would like to know your opinion on
those things.
So, currently, thi
On (09/01/17 11:35), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (08/01/17 21:44), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>>So, summing up the questions ...
>>>- Is there any problem on calling 'setenv("_SSS_LOOPS", "NO", 0)'
>>>earlier in the process?
>>>- Would be ok
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (08/01/17 21:44), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>diff --git a/src/util/server.c b/src/util/server.c
>>index c9a2726..d9da803 100644
>>--- a/src/util/server.c
>>+++ b/src/util/server.c
>>@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static const char *get_pid_path(void
On (08/01/17 21:44), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>diff --git a/src/util/server.c b/src/util/server.c
>index c9a2726..d9da803 100644
>--- a/src/util/server.c
>+++ b/src/util/server.c
>@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static const char *get_pid_path(void)
>
> int server_setup(const char *name, int flags,
>
On (09/01/17 10:43), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (08/01/17 21:44), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>>People,
>>>
>>>Recently I've faced some issues when testing the socket-activation
>>>working running as sssd-user, which will force me to take a
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (08/01/17 21:44), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>People,
>>
>>Recently I've faced some issues when testing the socket-activation
>>working running as sssd-user, which will force me to take a different
>>path for a few things and I really woul
On (08/01/17 21:44), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>People,
>
>Recently I've faced some issues when testing the socket-activation
>working running as sssd-user, which will force me to take a different
>path for a few things and I really would like to know your opinion on
>those things.
>
>So, currently,
12 matches
Mail list logo
