On 11/01/2016 02:06 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 11/01/2016 01:29 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Btw, I wanted to ask if the code for the new infrastructure is
going to reside in the contrib directory in SSSD repo or somewhere
else. Does someone have any preferences?
I have a preference for it to
On 11/01/2016 01:29 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Btw, I wanted to ask if the code for the new infrastructure is
going to reside in the contrib directory in SSSD repo or somewhere
else. Does someone have any preferences?
I have a preference for it to be in the SSSD repo, unless it's way too
different
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:48:14PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:31:20AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >> Hi Jakub,
> >>
> >> On 10/27/2016 05:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> > I'm currently working on inte
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:29:27PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
>
>
> On 11/01/2016 11:57 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > On 11/01/2016 11:36 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:31:20AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > > > Hi Jakub,
> > > >
> > > > On 10/27/2016 05:20 PM
On 11/01/2016 01:48 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Containers might be more dense (less resource-hungry) and it's quite
easy to bind-mount directories to share data like log files or the test
output. On the other hand, I know that running some s
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:31:20AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> Hi Jakub,
>>
>> On 10/27/2016 05:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > I'm currently working on integration tests for the 'files' provider and
>> > during this work I started to
On 11/01/2016 11:57 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 11/01/2016 11:36 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:31:20AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Hi Jakub,
On 10/27/2016 05:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
I'm currently working on integration tests for the 'files' provider and
dur
On 11/01/2016 11:36 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:31:20AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Hi Jakub,
On 10/27/2016 05:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
I'm currently working on integration tests for the 'files' provider and
during this work I started to feel we are pushing the bo
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:31:20AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On 10/27/2016 05:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > I'm currently working on integration tests for the 'files' provider and
> > during this work I started to feel we are pushing the boundaries around our
> > test infra
Hi Jakub,
On 10/27/2016 05:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
I'm currently working on integration tests for the 'files' provider and
during this work I started to feel we are pushing the boundaries around our
test infrastructure already quite a bit. When SSSD talks over network to
a server, then we're
Hi,
On 10/27/2016 04:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on integration tests for the 'files' provider and
during this work I started to feel we are pushing the boundaries around our
test infrastructure already quite a bit. When SSSD talks over network to
a server, then we're m
11 matches
Mail list logo
