-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/2010 08:25 PM, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> Do you have users asking for this? The intention is fantastic, but the idea
> sound scary.
>
Which part sounds scary?
Also, yes. There are some deployments I'm aware of that would very much
like to se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/2010 08:36 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 07:00:04 -0500
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/05/2010 05:15 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:18:19 -0400
>>>
Do you have users asking for this? The intention is fantastic, but the idea
sound scary.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 7, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 07:00:04 -0500
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/05/201
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 07:00:04 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/05/2010 05:15 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:18:19 -0400
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> One approach would be for GDM to provide an interface for a user
>
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 07:16:24 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I'm also wary of ever allowing an unauthenticated user access to a VPN
> shared secret, but if it was contacting a special VPN concentrator
> created for this purpose that only allowed authentication with
> one-time-passwords and only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/2010 06:28 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> I like the idea of an 'emergency' VPN connection, because as Simo
> mentioned it has a much broader use case then just the setting of the
> initial password. But for this I'm thinking of a perhaps simpler
> s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/05/2010 05:15 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:18:19 -0400
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> One approach would be for GDM to provide an interface for a user who
>> was not authenticated on the local machine to connect to a
>> NetworkM
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 05:15:08PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:18:19 -0400
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > One of SSSD's intended primary use-cases is that of the laptop user.
> > We support cached, offline authenti
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:18:19 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> One of SSSD's intended primary use-cases is that of the laptop user.
> We support cached, offline authentications to the local machine so
> that when a laptop user picks their machin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One of SSSD's intended primary use-cases is that of the laptop user. We
support cached, offline authentications to the local machine so that
when a laptop user picks their machine up from their desk and goes home
with it, they can still log in.
So wha
10 matches
Mail list logo