On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:53:59PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 10:23 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 06:30:40PM -0400, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >>Or you could write a wrapper function 'diff_string_lists_const' calling
> >>original 'diff_string_lists' but at least hid
On 04/07/2014 10:23 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 06:30:40PM -0400, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Or you could write a wrapper function 'diff_string_lists_const' calling
original 'diff_string_lists' but at least hiding the nasty discard_const_p.
Do we have the discard_const hack used
On (07/04/14 10:23), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 06:30:40PM -0400, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> Or you could write a wrapper function 'diff_string_lists_const' calling
>> original 'diff_string_lists' but at least hiding the nasty discard_const_p.
>
>Do we have the discard_const hack use
else than the AD
provider enumeration? If not, then I would just close the ticket. If
there are more occurences, the wrapper might help.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dmitri Pal"
> To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 11:57:47 PM
> Su
11:57:47 PM
Subject: Re: [SSSD] SSSD ticket #2214
On 04/03/2014 02:59 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was looking at
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2214
>
> I did not know about C being that paranoid with nested
> pointers to const data when passed as function ar
On 04/03/2014 02:59 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Hello,
I was looking at
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2214
I did not know about C being that paranoid with nested
pointers to const data when passed as function arguments (I
probably don't use const as often as I should, so I never bumped
into
Hello,
I was looking at
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2214
I did not know about C being that paranoid with nested
pointers to const data when passed as function arguments (I
probably don't use const as often as I should, so I never bumped
into this problem before).
Good explanation on wh
