[SSSD-users] Re: Is this still a security problem to be concerned about?

2021-03-21 Thread James Ralston
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 4:24 PM Spike White wrote: > If we limit our KRB5 encryption algorithms to only strong cyphers > (AES128 and AES256), would that thwart the above SSSD attack? No. The fundamental issue is this: if an attacker has compromised a Linux host, then the attacker has access to

[SSSD-users] SSSD - Dynamic Multiple NIC

2021-03-21 Thread Personne
Hello, I'm currently using an older version of SSSD 1.13 on Centos 6, we are migrating to Centos 7, and I was thinking of enabling dynamic DNS update. My problem is our servers do have multiple NIC from 1 to 6. Is there an article somewhere explaining how SSSD works with multiple NIC ? Since I

[SSSD-users] Re: Is this still a security problem to be concerned about?

2021-03-21 Thread Spike White
Pawel, Thank you for the detailed explanation. I know for the "Kerb-roasting" hacking technique, if you avoid the weak KRB5 ciphers (3des-cbc, arcfour-hmac), that thwarts this attack. If we limit our KRB5 encryption algorithms to only strong cyphers (AES128 and AES256), would that thwart the