On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 00:49 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 22:21 +, mythm...@runbox.com wrote:
> > Thanks Spike!
> >
> > It looks like extending the AD to cater for UIDs and GIDs is the most
> > supported and least effort change to allow us to use any NAS.
> >
> > If
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 22:21 +, mythm...@runbox.com wrote:
> Thanks Spike!
>
> It looks like extending the AD to cater for UIDs and GIDs is the most
> supported and least effort change to allow us to use any NAS.
>
> If we get approval, we'll likely come up with a system to populate these
>
Thanks Spike!
It looks like extending the AD to cater for UIDs and GIDs is the most supported
and least effort change to allow us to use any NAS.
If we get approval, we'll likely come up with a system to populate these values
in the AD from an existing SSSD Linux client so that they match, then