[SSSD-users] hostname resolution expired? (version 1.13.4-34.23.1.x86_64)

2019-04-17 Thread Beale (US), Gareth
We are seeing the following in our sssd_default.log which appears to coincide with some authentication failures. What would cause the hostname resolution to expire? Can we change the length of whatever timeout might be causing this? Sorry I have to obfuscate the hostnames per company policy.

[SSSD-users] Re: Issues with SSSD cache on version 1.13.4

2018-09-24 Thread Beale (US), Gareth
>The way the code is currently written is, if there is a duplicate: >- check if the "new" group has the same SID, uniqueID or original DN > as the "old" one > - yes, same: this is a rename, allow > - no, different: this is a duplicate, error I'm not clear on the start of this

[SSSD-users] Re: Issues with SSSD cache on version 1.13.4

2018-09-24 Thread Beale (US), Gareth
It's a good discussion, and I don't necessarily disagree with your thoughts on groups with the same GID, despite the nss_ldap implementation. I'd agree that any change in behavior should have an option to revert to previous but that it shouldn't be the default. However, is the issue with

[SSSD-users] Re: Issues with SSSD cache on version 1.13.4

2018-09-24 Thread Beale (US), Gareth
>I’m not so sure it would be a good idea to support this, honestly. Well that rather depends on what you mean by "this". I was reporting a problem that seemed an inconsistency to me. Either multiple groups with the same GID are supported, or they aren't. The current implementation is

[SSSD-users] Issues with SSSD cache on version 1.13.4

2018-09-21 Thread Beale (US), Gareth
We are running SUSE 12 SP3 which uses SSSD 1.13.4 which I believe is a LTM version. Due to the large number of users and groups in our LDAP directory, and the limitations of some legacy Unix systems, we have some large groups that have been broken into "sub-groups" with the same GID but an