On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:46:46PM +, Longina Przybyszewska wrote:
> Still, isn't it preferable to specify all domains in sssd.conf and use for
> each, dns_discovery_domain to speed up lookups?
I don't think so, because 1) you'd have to configure the domains on all
clients and 2) You'd lose c
7
To: 'End-user discussions about the System Security Services Daemon'
Subject: Re: [SSSD-users] [SSSD] New AD provider howto
Still, isn't it preferable to specify all domains in sssd.conf and use for
each, dns_discovery_domain to speed up lookups?
_
> Using ad provider in multi doma
Still, isn't it preferable to specify all domains in sssd.conf and use for
each, dns_discovery_domain to speed up lookups?
_
> Using ad provider in multi domain environment and Global Catalog search:
> -do I still need the section for each subdomain in sssd.conf? Can I
> configure sssd only f
Subject: Re: [SSSD-users] [SSSD] New AD provider howto
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:42:42AM +, Longina Przybyszewska wrote:
>> I think, it is worth to mention the 'msktutil' for joining AD; it is
>> specially useful for installing a batch of computers, Is well do
sssd-users-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:
> sssd-users-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Hrozek
> Sent: 15. april 2014 13:34
> To: sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Subject: Re: [SSSD-users] [SSSD] New AD provider howto
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:42:42AM +, Longin
-Original Message-
From: sssd-users-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:sssd-users-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Hrozek
Sent: 15. april 2014 13:34
To: sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [SSSD-users] [SSSD] New AD provider howto
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:42:42AM +, Longina Przybyszewska wrote:
> I think, it is worth to mention the 'msktutil' for joining AD; it is
> specially useful for installing a batch of computers,
> Is well documented with a lot of options. It lets to join domain independent
> from samba, with f
. april 2014 11:00
To: End-user discussions about the System Security Services Daemon
Subject: Re: [SSSD-users] [SSSD] New AD provider howto
One minor thing (not sure if worth mentioning): When installing IDMU on windows
server, it is quite useful to stop& disable the "server for NIS"
NIS).
Ondrej
From: sssd-users-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org
[sssd-users-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] on behalf of Simo Sorce
[s...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 6:09 PM
To: End-user discussions about the System Security Services Daemon
Subject: Re: [SSSD-users] [SSSD] N
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 11:14 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Well, the major technical reason is that it would be a
> backwards-incompatible change. Updating the SSSD and changing that
> behavior could very easily mean suddenly locking a whole lot of people
> out of their system. There's really
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/11/2014 08:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:11:40PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >> On 04/10/2014 04:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/2014 08:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:11:40PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> On 04/10/2014 04:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> our current HOWTO[1] on connecting SSSD to an AD DC is
>>> outdated, mostly bec
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:11:40PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 04:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >our current HOWTO[1] on connecting SSSD to an AD DC is outdated,
> >mostly because the page still only introduces the LDAP provider. Recently,
> >me,
> >Sumit and Jeremy Agee
On 04/10/2014 04:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
our current HOWTO[1] on connecting SSSD to an AD DC is outdated,
mostly because the page still only introduces the LDAP provider. Recently, me,
Sumit and Jeremy Agee wrote a new page that specifically advises to use
the AD provider and also use rea
14 matches
Mail list logo
