[SSSD-users] Re: SSSD Packet Capture Samples

Hi Jakub, Looked like the link was going to the Red Hat documentation. I think I have a PR to update this here: https://pagure.io/SSSD/docs/pull-request/42 Thanks, Tom On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Tom Peterson wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > That is awesome! I haven't forgot

[SSSD-users] Re: SSSD Packet Capture Samples

Hi Jakub, That is awesome! I haven't forgot about the id_provider=ad tests either. Just been tough finding some time lately but these are still on my list to add. I'm really happy to be able to contribute something here you find useful enough to link to from the SSSD docs themselves! SSSD has

[SSSD-users] Re: SSSD Packet Capture Samples

I opened a PR against the SSSD docs to include a link to your page: https://pagure.io/SSSD/docs/pull-request/40 I also realised that the sssd documentation is hard to contribute to, so I tried to add a README:

[SSSD-users] Re: SSSD Packet Capture Samples

Hi Jakub, That would be great if you wanted to link this page from the pagure docs! I'd love to collect some more pcaps and scenarios too! I think using id_provider=ad would be a great addition to these and I'll explore this next. I should be able to find some time this week to generate some

[SSSD-users] Re: SSSD Packet Capture Samples

> On 28 Jul 2017, at 12:39, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > On (27/07/17 15:30), Tom Peterson wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> First off thank you for all the hard work put into SSSD! It's been a great >> piece of software to work with and seems like it has a configuration >> setting

[SSSD-users] Re: SSSD Packet Capture Samples

Hi Lukas, Thanks for taking a look at this! I updated this to remove specific mention to the flag used to disable TLS. Thats a very good point and honestly I'm not even sure how I came across that in the first place! Thank you for the clarification on ldaps vs start_tls too. Looking forward to