[PULL] module and param

2012-03-25 Thread Rusty Russell
Note: I'm getting married next week, and then honeymoon until 6th May. I'll be offline from next week, except to post the compulsory pictures if Alex shaves her head... Thanks, Rusty. To g...@github.com:rustyrussell/linux.git 4eb05d5..f946eeb master -> master + 847ce6c...9dcbe9d for-linus ->

Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] md: fix clearing of the 'changed' flags for the bad blocks" failed to apply to 3.0-stable tree

2012-03-25 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:34:53AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:56:39 -0700 wrote: > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.0-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including th

Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] md: fix clearing of the 'changed' flags for the bad blocks" failed to apply to 3.0-stable tree

2012-03-25 Thread NeilBrown
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:56:39 -0700 wrote: > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.0-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > id to . Sorry - that should have been "stable

[stable] e1000e: Avoid wrong check on TX hang

2012-03-25 Thread Jeff Kirsher
Based on the original patch submitted my Michael Wang . Descriptors may not be write-back while checking TX hang with flag FLAG2_DMA_BURST on. So when we detect hang, we just flush the descriptor and detect again for once. -v2 change 1 to true and 0 to false and remove extra () This patch is appl