Hi Samuel,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 08:48:41AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:48:10PM +0200, Christophe Ricard wrote:
> > NFC_CMD_ACTIVATE_TARGET and NFC_ATTR_SE_PARAMS comments are missing.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> That's not a stable mater
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 08:58:52AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 08:48:41AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Christophe,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:48:10PM +0200, Christophe Ricard wrote:
> > > NFC_CMD_ACTIVATE_TARGET and NFC_ATTR_SE_PARAMS comments
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:07:16PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:48:25PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:35:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > > I ask this because I recall Peter once bought up a discussion:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 12:26:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:07:16PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:48:25PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:35:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > > > I ask this becaus
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:34:55 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 05:21:12PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch needs a followup that fixes a memory leak. The patch was not
>> tagged for stable and hasn't been merged to Linus' tree yet. The pa
>>
>> Please add:
>>
>>
On Thursday, October 22, 2015 08:03:08 PM Chen Yu wrote:
> Currently when system is trying to uninstall the acpi irq
> handler, it uses the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt directly.
> But acpi irq handler is actually installed by mapped irq
> in acpi_os_install_interrupt_handler, so this patch fixes
>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
sched/preempt, powerpc, kvm: Use need_resched() instead of should_resched()
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 08:15:09PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/23/2015 10:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.12 release.
> >There are 46 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issu
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:04:21PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/23/2015 10:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.2.5 release.
> >There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issue
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:13 AM, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-queue boot: 392 boots: 3 failed, 389 passed (v4.1.11-47-g3fcdfc320cb1)
>
> Full Boot Summary:
> http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v4.1.11-47-g3fcdfc320cb1/
> Full Build Summary:
> http://kernelci.org/build/stabl
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:14 AM, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-queue boot: 451 boots: 2 failed, 429 passed with 18 offline, 2
> conflicts (v4.2.4-54-g14568a171d8f)
>
> Full Boot Summary:
> http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v4.2.4-54-g14568a171d8f/
> Full Build Summary:
> h
Hi, Rafael
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net]
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 9:32 PM
> To: Chen, Yu C
> Cc: l...@kernel.org; Zhang, Rui; Zheng, Lv; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> stable@vge
When system is waiting for GPE/fixed event handler to finish,
it uses the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt directly. However, we
should use mapped irq returned by acpi_gsi_to_irq for synchronize_hardirq.
Cc: # 3.19+
Acked-by: Lv Zheng
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu
---
drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 ++--
1 file c
For ACPI compatible system, SCI(ACPI System Control
Interrupt) is used to wake the system up from suspend-to-idle.
Once the CPU is woken up by SCI, the interrupt handler will
firstly check if the current interrupt is legal to wake up
the whole system, thus irq_pm_check_wakeup is invoked
to validate
Currently when system is trying to uninstall the acpi irq
handler, it uses the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt directly.
But acpi irq handler is actually installed by mapped irq
in acpi_os_install_interrupt_handler, so this patch fixes
this problem by using the mapped irq returned from acpi_gsi_to_irq.
Hi Chen,
[auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please
suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Chen-Yu/ACPI-Using-correct-irq-when-waiting-for-events/20151025-010210
config: x86_64-randconfig-x015-20154
This should not be a valid warning IMO,
because PATCH 2/3 is based on PATCH 1/3,
and the warning of implicit declaration is defined
in PATCH 1/3.
> -Original Message-
> From: lkp
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 1:19 AM
> To: Chen, Yu C
> Cc: kbuild-...@01.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; l...
17 matches
Mail list logo
