Re: Patch "sched: Disallow sched_attr::sched_policy < 0" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree

2014-06-09 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:07:07PM -0700, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > sched: Disallow sched_attr::sched_policy < 0 > > to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/

Re: [PATCH 3.2 63/87] ext4: fix memory leak in xattr

2013-11-25 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 01:44:29PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > 3.2.53-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c > @@ -1269,6 +1269,8 @@ retry: > s_min_extra_isize) { >

Re: [ 05/11] ext4: fix memory leak in xattr

2013-10-21 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:53:34PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Dave Jones > > commit 6e4ea8e33b2057b85d75175dd89b93f5e26de3bc upstream. > &g

Re: [ 062/117] ext4: fix ext4_writepages() in presence of truncate

2013-09-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:07:11AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 17:18 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 3.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > know. > > > > -- > > > > From: Jan Kara > > > > commit 5f1132b2b

Re: s2disk broken (bisected) in 3.10.4

2013-08-14 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:12:58PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: > The following bisected commit > > > commit ea4c218f2c3e67f1bca8078ff1f80d7e0c2ab791 > Author: Dave Jones > Date: Fri Jun 28 12:13:52 2013 -0400 > > x25: Fix broken lock

Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review

2013-07-13 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 07:11:29AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Users expect vanilla .0 releases usable as production systems, to > > be updated (meaning, no new features, just stabilizing) with the > > corresponding -stable series. > > This really is a case by case basis. An unprivilege

Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review

2013-07-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 03:49:11PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 15:35 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > So the problem is that maintainers are lazy. They don't want to go > > back for bug fixes that have "proven" themselves, and even if they > > aren't critical bug fi

Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review

2013-07-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:01:17PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I'm sitting on top of over 170 more patches that have been marked for > the stable releases right now that are not included in this set of > releases. The fact that there are this many patches for stable stuff >

Re: + revert-ipc-dont-allocate-a-copy-larger-than-max.patch added to -mm tree

2013-03-26 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 06:51:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Revert 88b9e456b164. Dave has confirmed that this was causing oopses > > > during trinity testing. > > > > No, he didn't. > > hm, so perhaps he didn't run the test for long enough? It's now been running over 8 hours wi

Re: backport needed: fs: handle failed audit_log_start properly

2012-10-17 Thread Dave Jones
(apologies for resend, one day I'll get sta...@kernel.org out of my muscle memory) commit d1c7d97ad58836affde6e39980b96527510b572e needs backporting to older kernels. I found that during fuzz testing a while ago, but it seems that we have users starting to fall over it just by booting.. https:

Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Potential fix for leapsecond caused futex issue (v2)

2012-07-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 09:12:59PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On 07/01/2012 11:29 AM, John Stultz wrote: > > TODOs: > > * Chase down the futex/hrtimer interaction to see if this could > > be triggered in any other way. > > * Get Tglx's input/ack > > * Generate a backport for pre-v3.4 kernels

Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: fix vma_resv_map() NULL pointer" failed to apply to 3.4-stable tree

2012-06-01 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 04:25:11PM +0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > The patch below does not apply to the 3.4-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > id to . I'm

bsg sysfs fix.

2012-03-08 Thread Dave Jones
I think 37b40adf2d1b4a5e51323be73ccf8ddcf3f15dd3 should be in stable. It seems to affect 3.2.x.. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787862 Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordom

Re: missing udf patch

2012-02-01 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 06:56:18PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:47:30PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > We had a Fedora bug report that needed this. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770008 > > > >Dave &

missing udf patch

2012-02-01 Thread Dave Jones
We had a Fedora bug report that needed this. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770008 Dave commit 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d Author: Jan Kara Date: Fri Dec 23 11:53:07 2011 +0100 udf: Mark LVID buffer as uptodate before marking it dirty When we h