[PATCH] arm64: Fix THP protection change logic

2015-10-19 Thread Steve Capper
Tested-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulka...@caviumnetworks.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.cap...@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> [SteveC: backported 1a541b4e3cd6f5795022514114854b3e1345

Re: [PATCH] arm64: Don't report clear pmds and puds as huge

2015-07-01 Thread Steve Capper
On 1 July 2015 at 14:28, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:18:31PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:08:31PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c index

Re: [PATCH] arm64: Don't report clear pmds and puds as huge

2015-07-01 Thread Steve Capper
the behavior. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Thanks Christoffer. It may be worth adding: Fixes: 084bd29810a5 (ARM64: mm: HugeTLB support.) And, please feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Steve Capper steve.cap...@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org --- arch

Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Add double logical invert to pte accessors

2014-03-20 Thread Steve Capper
On 19 March 2014 23:55, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:30:38PM +, Steve Capper wrote: Page table entries on ARM64 are 64 bits, and some pte functions such as pte_dirty return a bitwise-and of a flag with the pte value. If the flag to be tested resides

[PATCH] arm64: mm: Add double logical invert to pte accessors

2014-03-17 Thread Steve Capper
patch to leave pte_write alone to allow for merge with 3.13 stable] Signed-off-by: Steve Capper steve.cap...@linaro.org --- This is a rebase of: 84fe682 arm64: mm: Add double logical invert to pte accessors It was CC stable, but had a merge conflict around pte_write when applied to 3.13-stable

Re: FAILED: patch [PATCH] ARM: 7923/1: mm: fix dcache flush logic for compound high failed to apply to 3.10-stable tree

2014-01-14 Thread Steve Capper
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:58:32AM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: The patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to