Re: [ 00/22] 3.0.57-stable review

2012-12-16 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:25:45 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.57 release. > There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. >

Re: [ 00/22] 3.0.57-stable review

2012-12-16 Thread Nikola Ciprich
Hi, LTP reports no new failed tests compared to 3.0.56 n. On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:25:45PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.57 release. > There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone

Re: [ 00/22] 3.0.57-stable review

2012-12-15 Thread Shuah Khan
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.57 release. >> There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any iss

Re: [ 00/22] 3.0.57-stable review

2012-12-15 Thread Shuah Khan
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.57 release. > There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Res

[ 00/22] 3.0.57-stable review

2012-12-14 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.57 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 22:16:57 UTC 2012. Anything receive