[ 00/39] 3.0.100-stable review

2013-10-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
NOTE: This is going to be the next-to-last 3.0.x release that I do. You should be moving off to the 3.4.x or 3.10.x longterm kernels by now, and not use the 3.0.x kernel unless you have to for some reason. If anyone has any problems with this, ple

Re: [ 00/39] 3.0.100-stable review

2013-10-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:34:44PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > NOTE: This is going to be the next-to-last 3.0.x release that I do. > You should be moving off to the 3.4.x or 3.10.x longterm kernels > by now, and not use the 3.0.x kernel unless y

Re: [ 00/39] 3.0.100-stable review

2013-10-11 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:14:05PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:34:44PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > NOTE: This is going to be the next-to-last 3.0.x release that I do. > > You should be moving off to the 3.4.x or 3

Re: [ 00/39] 3.0.100-stable review

2013-10-13 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 05:52:17PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:14:05PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:34:44PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > NOTE: This is going to be the next-to-last 3.0.x