Re: [3.4.y, 3.5.y] [SCSI] lpfc: fix problems with -Werror

2012-09-10 Thread Mike Pagano
On Monday, September 10, 2012 07:50:26 AM Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Mike Pagano wrote: > > > The patch from the original email, which appears to be a different problem > > that what you are talking about. > > Thanks for clarifying. If you have time for it, could you test > applying 4bdd03e61b7a a

Re: [3.4.y, 3.5.y] [SCSI] lpfc: fix problems with -Werror

2012-09-10 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Mike Pagano wrote: > The patch from the original email, which appears to be a different problem > that what you are talking about. Thanks for clarifying. If you have time for it, could you test applying 4bdd03e61b7a and let us know whether it fixes the bug? Gratefully, Jonathan -- To unsubscrib

Re: [3.4.y, 3.5.y] [SCSI] lpfc: fix problems with -Werror

2012-09-10 Thread Mike Pagano
On Sunday, September 09, 2012 06:42:07 PM Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi again, > > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Mike Pagano wrote: > > >> Greg, any other concerns preventing commital of this patch? > [...] > > which patch do you mean by "this patch"? If > > 4bdd03e61b7a, it seems

[3.4.y, 3.5.y] [SCSI] lpfc: fix problems with -Werror

2012-09-09 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi again, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Mike Pagano wrote: >> Greg, any other concerns preventing commital of this patch? [...] > which patch do you mean by "this patch"? If > 4bdd03e61b7a, it seems like a good idea. Ping. It wasn't a rhetorical question. Greg, please consider