Hello Wei Liu,
On 10.07.2014 14:41, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
@Wei Liu: You said that the patch is only a quick hack to detect, if my
analysis is correct and a proper fix would be needed. For us the
attached patch works, as the problem does
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:41:22AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
Hello Wei Liu,
On 10.07.2014 14:41, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
@Wei Liu: You said that the patch is only a quick hack to detect, if my
analysis is correct and a proper fix
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:41:22AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
Hello Wei Liu,
On 10.07.2014 14:41, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
@Wei Liu: You said that the patch is only a quick hack to detect, if my
analysis is correct and a proper fix
Hello Wei Liu,
On 11.07.2014 12:32, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:41:22AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
On 10.07.2014 14:41, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
@Wei Liu: You said that the patch is only a quick hack to
detect, if my analysis
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:02:18PM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
Hello Wei Liu,
On 11.07.2014 12:32, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:41:22AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
On 10.07.2014 14:41, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
@Wei Liu: You
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
Hello Wei Liu,
On 27.06.2014 20:24, Philipp Hahn wrote:
On 27.06.2014 19:48, Philipp Hahn wrote: I guess we found the problem
ourselves: For thus removed skb's the
reference counter on the associated vif was not decremented,
Hello Wei Liu,
On 27.06.2014 20:24, Philipp Hahn wrote:
On 27.06.2014 19:48, Philipp Hahn wrote: I guess we found the problem
ourselves: For thus removed skb's the
reference counter on the associated vif was not decremented, as it is
normally done in two locations at the end of the function
