On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:52:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:05:41PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno
updates coherent, only tricks to make
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:05:41PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno
updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since
commit
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno
updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since
commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458
Author: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
Date: Wed
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno
updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since
commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458
Author: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
Date: Wed Sep
We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno
updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since
commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458
Author: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +0100
drm/i915: Fix __wait_seqno to use true
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno
updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since
commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458
Author: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
Date: Wed Sep
We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno
updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since
commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458
Author: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +0100
drm/i915: Fix __wait_seqno to use true