Empirical evidence suggests that we need to: On at least one ivb
machine when running the hangman i-g-t test, the rings don't properly
initialize properly - the RING_START registers seems to be stuck at
all zeros.
Holding forcewake around this register init sequences makes chip reset
reliable agai
Empirical evidence suggests that we need to: On at least one ivb
machine when running the hangman i-g-t test, the rings don't properly
initialize properly - the RING_START registers seems to be stuck at
all zeros.
Holding forcewake around this register init sequences makes chip reset
reliable agai
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:18:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Empirical evidence suggests that we need to: On at least one ivb
> machine when running the hangman i-g-t test, the rings don't properly
> initialize properly - the RING_START registers seems to be stuck at
> all zeros.
>
> Holding f
Hi Daniel, please find a couple of comments inline.
BR,
Jani.
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 238a521..a0c76aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:04:41PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel, please find a couple of comments inline.
Oops, a clear case of -ENOTENOUGHCOFFEE. Thanks for catching these, I'll
follow up with a v2 shortly.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:16:04 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:04:41PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel, please find a couple of comments inline.
>
> Oops, a clear case of -ENOTENOUGHCOFFEE. Thanks for catching these, I'll
> follow up with a v2 shortly.
Fwiw, th
On 06/04/2012 06:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Empirical evidence suggests that we need to: On at least one ivb
machine when running the hangman i-g-t test, the rings don't properly
initialize properly - the RING_START registers seems to be stuck at
all zeros.
Holding forcewake around this registe
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:47:54AM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 06:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >Empirical evidence suggests that we need to: On at least one ivb
> >machine when running the hangman i-g-t test, the rings don't properly
> >initialize properly - the RING_START registe
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/i915: hold forcewake around ring hw init
to the 3.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
0005-drm-i9
tree --
>From b7884eb45ec98c0d34c7f49005ae9d4b4b4e38f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:18:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: hold forcewake around ring hw init
Empirical evidence suggests that we need to: On at least one ivb
machine when running the hangman i-
10 matches
Mail list logo