Re: FAILED: patch [PATCH] drm/i915: rip out the PM_IIR WARN failed to apply to 3.4-stable tree

2012-07-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:49 -0700, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: The patch below does not apply to the 3.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to

Re: FAILED: patch [PATCH] drm/i915: rip out the PM_IIR WARN failed to apply to 3.4-stable tree

2012-07-11 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:36:12PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:49 -0700, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: The patch below does not apply to the 3.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the

Patch drm/i915: rip out the PM_IIR WARN has been added to the 3.4-stable tree

2012-07-11 Thread gregkh
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled drm/i915: rip out the PM_IIR WARN to the 3.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: drm-i915-rip-out

FAILED: patch [PATCH] drm/i915: rip out the PM_IIR WARN failed to apply to 3.4-stable tree

2012-07-10 Thread gregkh
-- From 58bf8062d0b293b8e1028e5b0342082002886bd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:55:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: rip out the PM_IIR WARN After banging my head against this for the past few months, I still don't

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: rip out the PM_IIR WARN

2012-06-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 02:55:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: After banging my head against this for the past few months, I still don't see how this could possible race under the premise that once an irq bit is masked in PM_IMR and reset in PM_IIR it won't show up again until we unmask it in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: rip out the PM_IIR WARN

2012-06-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote: After banging my head against this for the past few months, I still don't see how this could possible race under the premise that once an irq bit is masked in PM_IMR and reset in PM_IIR it won't show up again