2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Gerrit Renker <ger...@erg.abdn.ac.uk>

This fixes commit (38ff3e6bb987ec583268da8eb22628293095d43b) ("dccp_probe:
Fix module load dependencies between dccp and dccp_probe", from 15 Jan).

It fixes the construction of the first argument of try_then_request_module(),
where only valid return codes from the first argument should be returned.

What we do now is assign the result of register_jprobe() to ret, without
the side effect of the comparison.

Acked-by: Gerrit Renker <ger...@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
(cherry picked from commit 1386be55e32a3c5d8ef4a2b243c530a7b664c02c)

Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>
---
 net/dccp/probe.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dccp/probe.c b/net/dccp/probe.c
index 4875998..3ba43b8 100644
--- a/net/dccp/probe.c
+++ b/net/dccp/probe.c
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static __init int dccpprobe_init(void)
        if (!proc_net_fops_create(&init_net, procname, S_IRUSR, 
&dccpprobe_fops))
                goto err0;
 
-       ret = try_then_request_module((register_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe) == 0),
-                                       "dccp");
+       try_then_request_module((ret = register_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe)) == 0,
+                               "dccp");
        if (ret)
                goto err1;
 
-- 
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to