Hi Cyrill,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> "Soft dirty bit" feature introduced in 3.11 kernel and as far as I know
> we've no plans to backport it on 3.10 series.
ok thanks for the information and the quick reply.
--
William
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:38:10PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I was wondering if v3.10.x stable branch was also concerned by this
> patch since I did not found it in this later branch.
> Maybe too hard to backport? (I saw that it requires new functions like
> pte_swp_soft_dirty wh
Hi Greg,
I was wondering if v3.10.x stable branch was also concerned by this
patch since I did not found it in this later branch.
Maybe too hard to backport? (I saw that it requires new functions like
pte_swp_soft_dirty which is not present in v3.10.x)
Maybe it was planned in the future?
Thanks,
3.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Cyrill Gorcunov
commit c3d16e16522fe3fe8759735850a0676da18f4b1d upstream.
If page migration is turned on in config and the page is migrating, we
may lose the soft dirty bit. If fork and mprot
